Finland has a strong tradition of technological competence. Maintaining that edge requires people with practical expertise at the table where policy decisions are made.
Most technology regulation is written by people who have never written code, deployed a system, or managed data at scale. When laws are drafted without that lived understanding, the result is rules that industry has effectively written for itself. I bring the perspective of someone who has built and run software systems professionally — and that shapes how I read proposed regulation.
Technology decisions are not isolated to a single policy area. They underlie education, privacy, democratic participation, public services, and economic competitiveness. A coherent technology policy requires connecting those threads rather than treating each in isolation.
-
Chat control: parliament was right
The European Parliament rejected the extension of the chat control law. The police statistics are real, but parliament was still right — here is why.
-
The use of biometric identifiers in passports must not be expanded
When fingerprints were added to passports, Finland created a national biometric register. Now the government wants to open it to police use.
-
Fundamental rights must not be dismantled without justification
The government plans to extend intelligence methods to fight crime without individual suspicion — a serious threat to fundamental rights.
-
Who decides what we talk about?
Are we prepared for our conversations to be steered by foreign large corporations? There are no guarantees that algorithms would not be used deliberately.
